Sexual Education Saves Money

Every time a new policy or curriculum is implemented in schools, it costs thousands of taxpayer dollars to put them in place. Unfortunately, not every change is cost-effective and valuable resources are taken away from other programs. This is a waste of government resources and to no surprise, President Trump, is ready to cut funds to every nonessential or wasteful governmesavings_account_interest_ratent program as he sees fit. Politicians in Congress and those within the Trump Administration are standing behind this idea that the only way to save money is to not spend it at all.

Last week, we discussed the cutting of federal funds from comprehensive sexual education programs to focus on less costly abstinence-only programs. This week, we found a study that dived deeper into programs that save money when funded correctly. Some politicians don’t believe putting money into comprehensive sexual education is worth it, but the numbers prove them wrong. A study from 2014 shows that $2.65 is saved for every dollar invested into comprehensive sexual education. That is a 265% return on investment that can be put elsewhere!

Not only would our children be getting a better sexual education, but funds can be reallocated elsewhere. The government would be making money with money! The study illustrates how the effectiveness of comprehensive sexual education programs leads to a decline in unplanned pregnancies and the spread of STDs. This translates into less federal funds being used for subsidized medical treatment for pregnant medical-costs-medical-cost-ratiowomen and benefits for children under the age of 5. It also reduces the amount of medical labor that is required to care for these pregnancies and STDs.

Additionally, A report by the Brooking Institute estimates that taxpayers can save between 2 and 6 dollars for every dollar spent towards pregnancy prevention policies and teen pregnancy prevention programs.  There is a reoccurring theme of saving money when the government invests more into proper sexual education and awareness. Doing nothing isn’t going to achieve anything. Congress and Trump need to look at the evidence! Comprehensive sexual education only reaps with benefits!

Advertisements

Don’t Dump the Funding, Trump!

In recent years, comprehensive sexual health programs have seen an increase in federal funding with about $176 million dollars spent in 2016; whereas, abstinence-only programs receive about half of that amount at $85 million dollars, also spent in 2016. Sexual educators can thank Former President Barack Obama for this allocation of funding, but the Obama Administration is something of the past with new laws and regulations coming about. The future of sexual education programs is now in the hands of the new and unpredictable administration of the United States of America.

trump-thumbs-down-800President Donald Trump and the Republican Party agree that the goal of sexual education programs is to reduce teen pregnancy, which has already been seeing a decline in the past few years alone. Unfortunately, they do not believe comprehensive sexual education is the reason for this lowering statistic. Instead, they believe the decline in teen pregnancy is due to restricting access to abortions and also the upbringing of more abstinence-only programs. These programs teach children that a faithful, married relationship is the only expected standard of sexual behavior and are extremely judgmental to any other type of sexual behavior that is outside the realm of marriage. Not only is this seen as naive in today’s society, but they are also against the use of contraceptives, even though they claim they would like to see a continuous decrease in teenage pregnancy, which contraceptives indeed help with. The underlying religious aspect of these programs prevents children from learning the full scope of what it means to be sexually active and performing healthy sexual behaviors.

abstinence-only-education-288x300Abstinence-only programs are not the answer to the problem of teen pregnancy. These programs try to induce a certain aspect of fear towards teenagers who may or may not be sexually active, which may work on some children, but the lack of “real-world” education puts these children at a disadvantage and at risk. Teens are exposed to many sexual behaviors through social media, their peers, and through subliminal messages each and every day. Without the proper education to prevent diseases from spreading and knowing of various alternative methods to prevent pregnancy, these kids are more likely to harm themselves and others. Most teens graduate high school and enter college without a formal sexual education from public school systems, other than experience. Instead of taking away funding from comprehensive sexual education programs, President Donald Trump should consider the implications behind teaching children that abstinence is the only way to be safe, which could have more backlash than anticipated.

Purpose

sexeducationThe goal of this blog is to inform our readers of how students across the country are receiving inadequate and inconsistent sexual education. There is currently no required standard for sexual education in this country and only 24 states mandate that sexual education be taught at all. Comprehensive sexual covers topics anatomy, physiology, families, personal safety, healthy relationships, pregnancy and birth, sexually transmitted diseases including HIV, contraceptives, sexual orientation, pregnancy options, media literacy and teaches medically accurate information. We suggest that comprehensive sexual education be mandatory in all public schools in the United States.

Introduction: Brandon Puhl

IMG_2404Hi! My name is Brandon Puhl and I am a Senior here at University of Maryland, College Park, seeking a Communications Major. I currently work at Best Buy as a Geek Squad Agent and I love what I do. I hope to continue on in the path of sales representation and to further build strong relationships with the customers I work with, but in a more formal setting once I graduate at the end of the year. I care about comprehensive sexual education because I don’t think public schools cover enough information that affect young people in today’s society. I’m currently taking a human sexuality course and I believe the content is more ‘real-world’ than anything I’ve learned in grade school. Young people should be more aware of the responsibilities that come with being sexually active and know everything there is to know to make the best decisions for themselves and others.