Sexual Education Saves Money

Every time a new policy or curriculum is implemented in schools, it costs thousands of taxpayer dollars to put them in place. Unfortunately, not every change is cost-effective and valuable resources are taken away from other programs. This is a waste of government resources and to no surprise, President Trump, is ready to cut funds to every nonessential or wasteful governmesavings_account_interest_ratent program as he sees fit. Politicians in Congress and those within the Trump Administration are standing behind this idea that the only way to save money is to not spend it at all.

Last week, we discussed the cutting of federal funds from comprehensive sexual education programs to focus on less costly abstinence-only programs. This week, we found a study that dived deeper into programs that save money when funded correctly. Some politicians don’t believe putting money into comprehensive sexual education is worth it, but the numbers prove them wrong. A study from 2014 shows that $2.65 is saved for every dollar invested into comprehensive sexual education. That is a 265% return on investment that can be put elsewhere!

Not only would our children be getting a better sexual education, but funds can be reallocated elsewhere. The government would be making money with money! The study illustrates how the effectiveness of comprehensive sexual education programs leads to a decline in unplanned pregnancies and the spread of STDs. This translates into less federal funds being used for subsidized medical treatment for pregnant medical-costs-medical-cost-ratiowomen and benefits for children under the age of 5. It also reduces the amount of medical labor that is required to care for these pregnancies and STDs.

Additionally, A report by the Brooking Institute estimates that taxpayers can save between 2 and 6 dollars for every dollar spent towards pregnancy prevention policies and teen pregnancy prevention programs.  There is a reoccurring theme of saving money when the government invests more into proper sexual education and awareness. Doing nothing isn’t going to achieve anything. Congress and Trump need to look at the evidence! Comprehensive sexual education only reaps with benefits!


The World of Sex Education

When examining the sex education curriculum of the United States and its various faults we should look to countries with leading comprehensive sex education programs and follow their lead.online_classroom

As demonstrated by the case of a Texas high school where 15 percent of the student body contracted chlamydia, all while there was no policy on sexual education, it is clear that an openness in discussing sex and sex education is crucial for children and teens to fully understand sex and its consequence. A lack of comprehensive sex education can lead to an ignorant culture of sexual violence or latency when it comes to preventative measures that can/have become normalized in our culture. As far as education is concerned it is important to shine a global spotlight on sex education and consent advocacy. An example of implementing reactionary programming to combat cultural trends would be England’s attempt by the PSHE Association (Personal, Social, and Health Education Association) to implement educational programs to teach topics surrounding consent as a reaction to reports by the Office for National Statistics that stated that in 2014 there were over “7,000 sexual assaults against children aged 13 or younger, and more that 4,000 rapes of children under 16.” The result was an educational system to teach about the topic of sexual consent to children in schools as young as age 11. Programs such as this are critically important to communities and aiding children’s understanding of not only sex and inappropriate behavior but also in providing education on personal boundaries, which is something that we should try to replicate in the United States._75353411_dsc_0047

European countries, in general, have most of the world’s lowest teen birth rates with countries such as Germany, Italy, and Switzerland having less than 4 teen births per 1,000 people. This commonly low teen birth rate among European countries can be linked to a more common practice of progressive sex education. This further proves that American’s need to steer away from misguiding teens on the subjective dangers and moral implications of sex but focus rather on the positive and factual topics surrounding sex as to better inform their youth. This current fear mongering approach is far less effective as can be exemplified by the US having one of the highest teen birth rates of developed nations at around 30 teen births per 1,000.

SLANGuage: How socialized language affects our sex ed.


When I first started dating my boyfriend, my good friend innocently tried to come up with a couple name for us, à la “Kimye” and “Brangelina” (r.i.p.). My name is Liz, and his name starts with a J. To everyone else’s humor, and to her own genuine confusion, her best idea was “Jiz.” This incident just became another on a list one can reference as proof How To Draw Squidward (6)that my friend never went to middle school ( it was never really a drawing of Squidward). To be perfectly frank, I didn’t know “jiz” was semen until high school. My high school years are peppered with memories of my goonish guy friends insisting that in a class of teenage boys, these are things I have to know, and and that by the end of high school they’d have corrupted me. But I reminisce all this to ask: why do people come up with alternate terms anyway? According to a timeline of sexual slang, compiled by Jonathan Green, people have been using sexual slang since 1888, when “jism” was used to refer to semen.

According to Timothy Jay’s book, Why We Curse: A Neuro-psycho-social Theory of Speech, researchers in 1979 asked subjects to write the word they use or learned for various genitalia and sexual acts in different contexts. Parent context “produced the most restricted range of terms” in 1979, and again in 1982 when the study was replicated. Parents are most likely to speak in euphemisms and to avoid using “sexual words,” impressing upon children that these words have a lot of power. Until they begin to learn slang from their peers, these words and topics remain taboo. The study shows that people use separate lexicons depending on the social setting or listeners. Jay’s four systems of sexual language could technically all be used to describe the same thing, but herein lies the problem: the sex ed. we learn in school is only tied to the medical-scientific lexicon. Sex ed. in most schools is largely anatomical. It’s about organs, and microscopic processes, disease and protocol. It fails to address the cognitive, emotional aspects of sex, as well as our other understandings or sex.  Sex ed. as it is now, is merely a chapter of anatomy class. It only serves to drive a wedge between parts of a whole, and not without consequences. Separating the feelings of sex from the science can lead to disassociation between them. The social implication that sex is taboo leaves many people to figure it out on their  But what are the consequences?

3.-KissingAt the risk of being too candid, I offer up my own realizations. My only form of sexual education was through school. My parents never had the talk with me. I understood sex at a basic procedural level. I never connected the dots or understood that the same procedures, specifically an erection, could happen without actually having intercourse. When I became aware of this fact through real life, I was horrified, because I’m planning to wait for marriage to have sex. Until it was explained to me that erections can happen often for guys, especially in the close company of their girlfriends and even at random, I was in a state. My lack of knowledge and disassociation between process and emotion left me unprepared, which in turn caused me shock, horror, and even shame, anger, and fear that I had done something against my values. For someone else, it could be an actual breaking or their values, an STD, or an unplanned pregnancy.

I have to say my classmates failed. There’s still a lot that I’m clueless about. And our separate contexts for different terms don’t bring us any closer.  Rectifying this issue may ask us to take a flying leap out of our comfort zones. The gap in understanding isn’t necessarily caused by the fact that schools use medical-scientific terms. It may feel uncomfortable or too “formal” to say “vagina”, so use “pussy.” Too rigid to say “penis”, so say “dick.” (See what I did there?). And should you need to talk about semen, you may find it more casual and less obvious to say “jiz.”Our task is to tie these different language sets together so that we understand what we’re addressing no matter what words are used to communicate it, so that we can be prepared for sex (horizontal exercise, hot beef injection, bit-of-that-there, mattress polo, pudding…whatever you want to to call it), and everything that comes with it.

Comprehensive Sex Ed is a Human Right

It’s no surprise that students have questions about sex. What is a surprise, however, is how few of their questions are being answered in school. Young people have a right to receive accurate and comprehensive information about their bodies, relationships, and sex, yet only 22 states mandate that sex education be taught.

While comprehensive sexual education includes teaching students medically accurate information about contraceptives, pregnancy, and STIs, it also addresses issues affecting the overall well-being of young people. How to communicate needs, develop healthy relationships, and make responsible decisions regarding sexuality are all topics covered in comprehensive sex education and are topics that students, regardless of which state they live in, should know.

There is no denying that sexuality can be a very influential aspect of our lives. When we withhold information about sexuality from students, we are directly impacting their right to make informed decisions about their own bodies. Guaranteeing young people understand how influential sexuality can be on their lives and how to navigate such sexuality is a moral thing to do.

While there have definitely been advancements in the call for comprehensive sex ed, many schools are still teaching ideologically driven information that threatens student’s fundamental right to receive accurate information regarding sexual health. In fact, over 80% of abstinence Image result for comprehensive sex edonly curriculum was found to contain false or distorted information about reproductive health. Specifically, many courses were found teaching false information about the risk of abortion and effectiveness of contraception, while promoting gender stereotypes and religious belief as scientific fact. Additionally, these programs rarely include information regarding LGBTQ sexual health, therefore excluding specific students from receiving the information they need. Comprehensive sex ed does not focus on abstinence as a moral compass and does not use a student’s sexual activity as an indicator of what type of person they are, it promotes sexual health in a way that doesn’t shame the students, simply educates them. 

With only certain states requiring sex education and even fewer requiring that information be medically accurate, the quality of education students are receiving about their own well-being varies depending on where they live. Knowledge regarding the overall well-being of young people should not be limited to the students who happen to live in areas that teach comprehensive sex education. Having no sex ed programs or programs that leave students unprepared is unethical. All people, young people especially, should have the right to accurate, honest, and comprehensive sexual education so that they can make informed decisions about their health.

Sexual health and feeling in control of one’s own sexual decisions is a right I believe all students are entitled to. Withholding information about contraception and using scare tactics to persuade students to abstain from sex is a shameful infringement on this right.